![]() ![]() What criteria might children learn to use when judging the reliability of material (whether it comes in books, online, or from those around them)? They should learn to seek confirmation that the material is based on expertise-scientists know more than others about the transmission of infection, psychologists are likely to know more about what makes people adopt new habits, and farmers are good sources of information about herding livestock. They have the right instincts but they need help sustaining and honing that instinct, as they grow older. As they get older, children put less trust in social and emotional ties and more emphasis on the source’s previous accuracy. Researchers have shown that three-year-old children use two methods when deciding to trust what adults tell them: how emotionally attached they are, and the adult’s previous accuracy. A thirst for knowledge should become a thirst for reliable information. Next, children need help learning how to evaluate the reliability of any given set of facts they have gathered. Fostering inquiry also requires teachers who model genuine interest in thinking about the unknown and comfort with uncertainty. Instead, solving genuine mysteries and acquiring expertise in domains that intrigue the learner would sit at the core of the curriculum. Mind you, such pursuits have little in common with the traditional projects teachers often offer as a sweetener for more “essential” learning. For some it will be insects, for others, building structures, exploring the nature of death, or considering embodiments of infinity. ![]() Teachers can build upon young children’s urge to know, helping them become more sustained and persevering in their pursuit of information.įirst, students need plenty of opportunity to pursue individual interests, no matter how quirky. Studies also show that children’s inquiry is highly sensitive to adult behavior. For instance the rate of question asking drops precipitously when children are in school-from one question every two minutes, to less than one question every two hours. ![]() Research shows that schoolchildren show far less curiosity than they did just a few months earlier, while at home. It underlies the vast universe of knowledge that defines our species.Īnd yet for the most part schools dampen rather than build on this natural urge to find out. Researchers describe this as epistemic curiosity, a need for understanding. Children seek explanations for a wide range of phenomena: why an ice cube melts in the sun, where grandma goes when she leaves, and how the family dog knows where to poop. But by the time they are three, they have acquired the power tool: questions about why and how things are the way they are. Those what, when and where queries are the hand tools of question-asking. Many of these questions seek simple facts: the names of things, the time something will happen, or where an object or person is located. Research shows that young children typically ask a question every two minutes. They have mastered the routines that govern daily life, and have become adept at any number of clever tricks and strategies for attracting, entertaining, convincing, and deceiving others.īy the time they are three, they have acquired another tool that catapults them forward: they have learned to ask questions. They have absorbed the customs and norms of their family and close circle. Though born fairly incompetent compared to other mammals (who walk, play and feed themselves within hours or days of birth), by the time children are three they have learned how to talk and form concepts (something few if any other animals can do). This urge to explain the unexpected drives a huge amount of their daily behavior, and accounts for the enormous intellectual growth humans go through during their first few years of life. What do they do next? They pay attention, studying the new material until it is familiar. Shown a series of familiar images and then something new, their whole system goes on alert: breathing, heart beat and skin moisture all change, indicating that they have noticed the surprise. Infants are born with a pervasive and ferocious desire to absorb new information. However, many current school practices do more to obstruct than foster the inclination and ability to seek new information, evaluate its reliability, and use it to form rather than shore up opinions. But research also shows that education can help overcome that tendency. ![]() Researchers have labelled this common phenomenon, Myside Bias. It’s human nature to lean towards evidence that supports one’s opinions, and push away input that challenges those opinions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |